Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

Dem corruption blues

June 15th 2009 01:02
The Democrats are having some problems with corruption, and it may benefit the GOP:

The revelation that Democratic appropriations kingpins may face an ethics investigation of their campaign donations moves Republicans closer to gaining a corruption issue in 2010.

Republicans know well how lapses in ethical standards can sink a political party. They lost control of the House in the 2006 midterm election, succumbing in part to accusations from Democrats that the GOP had produced a "culture of corruption" in which lobbyists showered gifts on lawmakers in exchange for government contracts and other legislative favors.

Of course, it was always just a matter of time until this happened. Both parties struggle with corruption issues. It is endemic to Washington. However, the party in power normally gets the most attention and blame. Also, the party in power is most susceptible to the lures of deceit because they hold the power and the pursestrings. The stench of malfeasance then grows and grows until the pots of depravity boil over. Once it becomes bad enough, the out-of-power party can use it as a campaign tool with which to bludgeon the in-power party. Have we reached the tipping point with the Dems? We're getting close. An astronomical amount of money is being spent in Washington, and that much money is a catalyst for the germination of corruption. It will certainly be an issue in some races in 2010. If it continues to spread (and it almost certainly will), it could be one the main GOP mantras throughout the country in next year's elections.

What I'm confused about, though, is this: Wasn't Barack Obama going to put an end to this favor-pedding? I thought he was going to bring us some of that RE-form (his official branding of it was hope and change, if I remember correctly). Oh, wait. That's right. He signed legislation to curtail lobbyist influence -- then he proceeded to make exceptions and install loopholes that you could drive a taxpayer-funded heavy equipment truck through. Oh, well. Maybe we can do better next time, right?

59
Vote


   

   

   


Comments
8 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by S.L.

June 15th 2009 01:36
If we kicked all the criminals out of Washington DC, PopCon, it would be a ghost town. Come to think of it, it wouldn't be nearly as expensive as it is now if a bunch of ghosts lived there! It's the level of power and importance that corrupts them (not to mention the money). We need a serious house cleaning in 2010 to remove the roaches.

Comment by Lester Caudill

June 15th 2009 03:10
It is a serous problem that is choking any forward constructive progress we could make, and will never make until we like S.L. said we have a big house cleaning in both parties.

Comment by PopulistConservative

June 15th 2009 04:06
SL and Lester, maybe we'll get that house cleaning soon. It's long overdue.

Again, term limits would solve a LOT of these problems.

Comment by Mike Pouraryan

June 15th 2009 13:56
You guys are the ones who should be for the rule of law. Everyone should be presumed innocent...I think I read that somewhere. The Republicans have paid the price. If the democrats are guilty, they will too.

Comment by S.L.

June 15th 2009 14:06
IF the Democrats are guilty, Mike? IF? Good grief, don't you pay attention to anything?

Comment by PopulistConservative

June 15th 2009 21:23
I'm for the rule of law, Mike. They should get their day in court. It doesn't take a conviction, though, to know that Washington is full of favor-peddling and corruption.

Comment by Mike Pouraryan

June 15th 2009 23:51
S.L,

Until the Constitution is torn up, I would presume all to be innocent. If you wish to stop believing in the constitution, that's your right..it is a free country...

Comment by S.L.

June 16th 2009 01:32
There are no Czars in the Constitution, Mike. Abortion isn't granted in the Constitution, Mike. Running up an enormous debt on maybes isn't in the Constitution, Mike. I do believe that B.O. (B.S.) needs to be prosecuted for high crimes and misdemeanors (provision for which is in the Constitution).

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
14 Posts
3 Posts
4 Posts
264 Posts dating from October 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

PopulistConservative's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]