Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | My Orble | Login

A sickly health care bill

June 21st 2009 09:02
Obama's prospects for reforming health care took a major hit last week:

The Congressional Budget Office, described as the judge, jury and final arbiter on health care reform, cut the legs out from Sen. Kennedy's health reform plan, one of two that will begin moving through the Senate.

The summary table at the end says it all: a six percentage point drop in the number of uninsured -- from 49 million in 2010 to 37 million in 2019 -- is all you get for $1-plus trillion.

We would spend more than a trillion dollars and only reduce the number of uninsured by 25%? What's the point? At that rate, it would take more than four trillion dollars to cover everyone who's uninsured. That's a tall order for a country that is already drowning in debt. We just can't afford it.

This is what I don't understand. Instead of trying to guarantee health care for everyone, why doesn't Obama focus like a laser on addressing the runaway costs associated with health care? There are lots of actions that could be taken. Streamline forms and set standards for medical records. Encourage digitization of those records. Open competition up by allowing companies and individuals to shop for health care from providers all across the country. Increase the number of doctors in the country by opening additional medical schools and/or expanding existing medical schools. Address the high costs resulting from often frivolous malpractice suits. Incentivize doctors to only perform necessary procedures. Incentivize individuals to improve their health through wellness programs. Eliminate bureaucratic red tape in government health programs like Medicaid and Medicare. Either deport illegal immigrants who are getting free health care in emergency rooms or start billing their home countries for the services they receive. There are so many things that could be done to bring down the cost of health care. Get busy working on that and health care could be more accessible and affordable for everyone.

As it is, I don't think Obama will be able to get any kind of meaningful health care reform passed. The costs of reforming health care are staggering and it would just be too big of a pill to swallow. Add in the fact that the aforementioned proposal would still leave nearly 40 million people uninsured and the whole effort just seems ridiculous and reckless.

49
Vote


   

   

   


Comments
8 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by S.L.

June 21st 2009 09:13
He's an elitist politician, PopCon. The last thing he cares about is actually doing something about health care. It made a good campaign slogan and is now making him look like he gives a rats behind about the "little people." Your ideas make too much sense for him to even consider.

Health care and education are two long-time favorites of politicians...

Comment by Lester Caudill

June 21st 2009 11:38
Good post PopulistConservative, I agree with S.L. your ideas make more sense than Obama's. Health care, and Education are the two things dems are known for and just look at what miserable shape both are in.

Comment by rickb_georgia

June 21st 2009 17:14
47 to 50 million uninsured Americans is a political myth. The figure is a "best guess" based on census statistical data 2005 - 2007 as interpeted by various studies and / or comissions. The figure includes 7 to 11 million persons in this country illegally and another 15 - 20 million folks that are uninsured by choice. They have elected to be self insured. When they have a major issue ... then they want retroactive insurance ... or at least someone to foot the bill. So, we have 20 - 25 million folks who really need help and this is a reasonable figure. I like PopCon's suggestion of sending the bill home for those illegals abusing the health care system.

The system needs revision including all of the things you pointed out PopCon ... nice job.

I would like to see the politicians and their activists and the media use more accurate information in their presentations.

As SL pointed out, Obama and his gang have picked a popular topic to hijack.. Obama's public plan would put him in control of our healthcare within a couple of years at the most as the insurance companies will be history. In short order he has gained control of our banks, much or our manufacturing industry and is trying to control our health care dollars. That represents most of our money and that scares me. Freedom will be the exception rather than the rule in this country.

Comment by PopulistConservative

June 21st 2009 18:39
SL, this is his signature issue. He's talked about it ad nauseum. He has large majorities in the House and Senate. If he and the Democrats don't deliver, it'll be viewed as a monumental failure.

Comment by S.L.

June 21st 2009 18:42
A Catch 22, PopCon? If he does what he really plans, it will be a failure for the whole country. A really expensive failure.

Comment by PopulistConservative

June 21st 2009 18:44
The problem they have, Lester, is that their plans all cost a fortune to implement. That's why I advocate cost-cutting. That doesn't cost a fortune. It doesn't build up bureaucracies -- it tears them down. I just don't understand why politicians don't see that. If we could provide health care for the entire country for free, I'd love it. We can't, though. We just can't afford it. Maybe if they STARTED with the cost-cutting, we could afford to expand coverage. Cost-cutting must come first, though.

Comment by PopulistConservative

June 21st 2009 18:52
You're absolutely right, rick. I actually covered that in a previous version of this post, but I took it out because the post was too long. That 49 million figure is hogwash. It includes illegal aliens and folks who can afford insurance but don't want it.

They claim they want to have a public option because it would "keep the insurance companies honest" by providing competition. Like you, though, I'm also concerned that it would drive private insurers out of business. How does a company compete with the government when the government doesn't have to turn a profit and has an almost endless supply of money to spend? It can't compete. If the Democrats REALLY want competition, then loosen rules about buying insurance and let the people choose from a wide variety of providers. I heard this morning that there are 1300 insurance providers in the US. If the Dems want competition, let them all compete against each other. If that happened, prices would certainly drop.

Comment by PopulistConservative

June 21st 2009 18:54
That's right, SL. You don't spend a fortune to save money. That's counterintuitive. You save money by NOT spending a fortune.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
14 Posts
3 Posts
4 Posts
264 Posts dating from October 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

PopulistConservative's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]